Alteration of gene expression in human keratinocytes by aryl hydrocarbon receptor and retinoic acid receptors
Experience the future of the Tulane University Digital Library.
We invite you to visit the new Digital Collections website.
Description
Investigation of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD or dioxin) response in HuE-1 and SCC-12F keratinocyte cell lines revealed differential responses. Exposure of SCC-12F keratinocytes to dioxin produced a cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) response, assayed by ethoxycoumarin-o-deethylase activity (15-35 pmol/mg protein/minute at 1-100 nM TCDD). Neither HuE-1 keratinocytes or HEK 293 cells (human embryonic kidney) produced this response (5 pmol or 1 pmol/mg protein/min for HuE-1 and HEK, respectively at 100 nM TCDD). HuE-1 cells possess truncated ARNT protein, which could cause lack of dioxin signaling in these cells. Transfection of HEK 293 cells with a CYP1A1 promoter construct, followed by dioxin exposure, induced reporter gene activity 2-3 fold, indicating these cells responded to dioxin but the endogenous CYP1A1 gene was defective Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-$\beta$), upregulated in keratinocyte culture medium by trans-RA exposure (683.2 pmol vs. 157 pmol in control), was suppressed by TCDD (41 pmol). The dominant TCDD effect was due, at least in part, to TCDD-mediated loss of trans-RA binding to its receptor (RARs) (Kd = 0.13 nM, 1.8 fmol binding sites vs. Kd = 0.13 nM, 4.3 fmol binding sites in control). Loss of binding affected trans-RA-mediated transcription, determined by transfection with a retinoic acid responsive reporter plasmid (trans-RA reporter activity = 48.1% of control, TCDD activity = 164% of control, TCDD + RA activity = 171.3% of control) Investigation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) production in HuE-1 keratinocytes revealed RAR-$\alpha$ suppressed EGFR transcription, determined by a luciferase reporter assay in absence of added ligand in every case (5.4% control). When cells were confluent and differentiating, a second RAR isoform, RAR-$\gamma ,$ was less effective at suppressing EGFR production (93% of control). When cells were actively proliferating, both RAR-$\alpha$ and RAR-$\gamma$ appeared equally effective in this action (23% vs 28% of control, for RAR-$\alpha$ or RAR-$\gamma ).$ Examination of RAR protein in HuE-1 cells revealed RAR-$\gamma$ protein was always present. RAR-$\alpha$ was only detected when added exogenously via an expression plasmid. This revealed the required up-regulation of RAR-$\alpha$ to aid cells through differentiation, while RAR-$\gamma ,$ present in high abundance, appears ineffective in mediating differentiation