The Ethical Vision of George Eliot (Video)

  • [Music]
  • Hello, everyone. I'm Professor Thomas Albrecht of  the English Department here at Tulane University.  
  • I'm going to talk to you briefly about  
  • a recent book publication of mine entitled,  The Ethical Vision of George Eliot.
  • George Eliot was the pseudonym of an  english writer named Mary Anne Evans,  
  • one of the most important novelists  of the European 19th century.  
  • She lived from 1819 to 1880, so most of her  adult life took place during what we call  
  • the Victorian Period. She was revered and  celebrated in her time as well as in our  
  • own for the seven astonishing novels she wrote  during the period from 1859 to 1876. The most  
  • well known of her novels is Middlemarch, a  study in provincial life which appeared in 1872.
  • George Eliot is a highly significant figure  in 19th century European literature, in the  
  • 19th century European novel, and also in  19th century European women's writing.  
  • She's an important figure in the  tradition of literary realism,  
  • and a pivotal figure in the transition  from literary realism to literary modernism.
  • The realism was groundbreaking in  terms of its rigorous historicism,  
  • its panoramic social perspectives, its  psychological penetration and complexity,  
  • its rhetorical and formal sophistication, and  its compassionate humanism. Eliot is also an  
  • important figure in the rich creation of European  philosophical fiction and in the novel of ideas.
  • My book that I will talk briefly about, The  Ethical Vision of George Eliot, is a study of  
  • some ideas about ethics that Eliot developed  over the course of her career in her writings.  
  • My areas as a literary scholar are philosophical  approaches to literature and literature and ethics.  
  • As you can guess, this means that I think and write  about literary works in terms of how they directly  
  • or indirectly engage with philosophical and  ethical topics. George Eliot takes up explicitly  
  • philosophical and ethical questions throughout  her novels. And many of the questions and topics  
  • that she takes up correlate with the questions  and topics that engage us so urgently today  
  • in our own time. This is just one reason  among many why I'm so drawn to her writings.
  • A key ethical topic Eliot repeatedly takes up  is the relationship that we as human beings have  
  • or should have to what philosophers call "the  other." "The other" means other individual persons,  
  • their minds that are separate from our own, and  also other kinds of persons. Persons who are  
  • categorically different from ourselves in terms of  their social or economic class, their nationality,  
  • their language, gender, religion, race, or age.
  • In my book I show how early  in her career especially,  
  • Eliot exhorts her readers, her characters, and  herself to recognize and value a common humanity  
  • in other persons no matter how outwardly and  circumstantially different those persons might be  
  • from ourselves. This attention to commonality  is an urgent ethical imperative in our own time.  
  • For example, in the context of our divisive  presidential election. A context in which so  
  • many of us have struggled to see any humanity at  all in persons who disagree with us politically.  
  • My book also shows how Eliot, increasingly  over the course of her career, comes to posit  
  • the recognition of difference or otherness.  The otherness of the other from ourselves  
  • as an ethical imperative in its own right. And  she comes to insist, increasingly, that we not  
  • erase that otherness, the otherness of the  other, under the rubric of a common humanity.  
  • Rather she insists we should recognize the other's  otherness from ourselves and we should respect it.  
  • For Eliot, respect means not presuming to  know the other or to speak for the other.  
  • By respecting the other in this way, we not only  preserve the other's otherness as an inherent value,  
  • but we strike a blow against egoism, the moral  fallacy Eliot spends a lifetime combating  
  • and diagnosing in us, in her characters,  and also in herself.  
  • The egoism we strike a blow against  is our own, at least potentially.  
  • It is our presumption to know and to speak  about the other. Our tendency, narcissistically,  
  • to see the other as a reflection of some  element some prejudice within ourselves.  
  • My book shows how both these moral imperatives:  the imperative to recognize a common humanity  
  • and the imperative to recognize and respect  differences, are essential parts of Eliot's  
  • overall ethical vision. Over the course of her  career, they mutually inform and dialectically  
  • develop one another, suggesting that for Eliot  any genuinely ethical relationship  
  • to the other requires both the capacity to  recognize commonalities and the capacity  
  • to respect differences. In her final writings  Eliot concludes that genuine relationships,  
  • genuine connections with other persons across  various differences, are indeed possible. But only  
  • on the hard condition of our first recognizing  and respecting the differences that separate us.
  • My writing and teaching about literature  strive to reveal complex existential,  
  • psychological, and ethical insights that writers  like George Eliot can give us through their  
  • works. Eliot herself believes that literature has a  unique power to transform us morally by surprising,  
  • by jolting us into an unexpected awareness  of both human commonalities and differences.  
  • I find with my students here at Tulane, that this  is as true in our own time as it was in Eliot's.  
  • Thank you so much for listening.
  • [Music]