The New Politics of Olympos: Kingship in Kallimachos' Hymns (Video)

  • [Music]
  • My name is Michael Brumbaugh and I'm an Associate  Professor in the Department of Classical Studies  
  • and Affiliate Faculty in Latin American Studies.  Since coming to Tulane in 2013 my teaching and  
  • research have ranged broadly over topics in  the languages and literatures of the ancient  
  • Greeks and Romans as well as their subsequent  legacies from antiquity down to the present day.  
  • In particular I'm interested in topics related  to how Greek literature and literary culture  
  • intersect with political ideology.  
  • Now today when we hear the word "political" our  minds naturally go to our own political system,  
  • dominated as it is here in the U.S. by two  opposing political parties. Now ancient versions  
  • of this sort of factionalism do occasionally  crop up in my work, but more often I'm focused on  
  • a broader view of what constitutes politics. Today  I'll be talking about my book, The New Politics of  
  • Olympus, which came out in 2019. But before getting  into the details of that book I thought it'd be  
  • useful to take a step back and get a clearer  picture of the kind of politics I'm referring to.  
  • So let's start off with a reasonably well-known  quotation by a pretty well-known ancient Greek.  
  • In the first book of his Politics  Aristotle says that, "The human is by  
  • nature a political animal." Of course when  he said it, it sounded something more like,
  • "Ο άνθρωπος είναι εκ φύσεως πολιτικό ζώο."
  • Now whatever image that may conjure  to a modern mind, it might be more  
  • helpful to translate Aristotle's phrase  "πολιτικό ζώο" as a creature of the polis,  
  • which is the Greek word for a city-state.  Aristotle goes on to say that unlike other animals,  
  • say bees for example, who are similar to us  insofar as they live in a sort of community  
  • and respond to positive and negative physical  stimuli, humans have the power of speech. And this  
  • in Aristotle's view is crucial because  it allows us to respond to pleasure  
  • and to pain by saying, "I like that" or "Hey,  that hurts." In the context of a community  
  • humans thereby come to develop both individual  and shared perceptions of what is good and bad,  
  • right and wrong, etc. Naturally perceptions of  these moral qualities are going to vary over time  
  • from place to place and indeed within a single  community. But Aristotle believed that language  
  • and communication with others in the polis is what  enables the uniquely political animal to make the  
  • leap from merely experiencing pleasure and pain  physiologically to articulating and debating more  
  • nuanced moral ideas that emerge from efforts to  collectively maximize pleasure and minimize pain.
  • As moral ideas take shape, they come to have  influence over the structure of our lives  
  • within the polis community. And taken together,  they form ideologies or constellations of  
  • ideas that guide our decision making and help us  rationalize and justify our political structure.
  • Given that language is the medium for working  out these ideas, it's hardly surprising that  
  • literature would serve both as a vehicle  for transmitting them across space and time,  
  • but also as a laboratory for experimenting with  them. So we've got to think about literature not  
  • just as a static heap of book roles tucked  away in the library, but instead as an ongoing  
  • dynamic conversation, just as Raphael sought to  depict it here in the School of Athens fresco.  
  • And so Greek literature offers us a distillation  of the Greek's obsession with asking and answering  
  • questions about the best and the worst way  to organize just about everything; from an  
  • individual life to the entire political community.  Sometimes this takes the form of a philosophical  
  • treatise that explicitly teases out this or  that set of questions. Plato famously carries  
  • out his investigations in dramatic dialogues where  characters discuss the nature of piety, or goodness,  
  • or justice while going on a walk together or  sitting under a shady tree beside a stream.  
  • Most literature, however, doesn't attack these  questions head on, but instead examines them in  
  • the context of human lives. Thus we can see how  moral and political questions are being worked  
  • out in narratives set in front of reading or  listening audiences who can actively engage  
  • with the material by creating inferences and  analogies relevant to their own experiences.
  • My book examines the intersections of politics  and literary culture at a period when Greek  
  • power and influence was not limited to the  area occupied by the modern nation of Greece,  
  • but instead swept over most of Mediterranean  basin extending as far as present-day Pakistan.  
  • At the head of a vast army, Alexander the Great  absorbed most of this territory into a single  
  • kingdom in just a few years. But his sudden and  unexpected death in 323 sent fissures shooting  
  • through his empire as his successors struggled to  assert claims to his power. The most successful of  
  • these carved up his spear-one territory and  set about creating kingdoms of their own. 
  • In most cases ruling over ethnically and culturally  diverse populations who had not previously existed  
  • together in a single political community. The most  effective of these successors was named Ptolemy,  
  • who ruled over Egypt, controlled the waterways in  many of the islands of the eastern Mediterranean,  
  • as well as significant portions of  the coastline from present-day Libya  
  • to Lebanon. The dynasty he established stood  for nearly 300 years until the future Roman  
  • emperor Augustus deposed the last Ptolemy,  queen Cleopatra, and annexed her territory.  
  • The Ptolemaic kingdom with all its power, the vast  territory it claimed, the dynasty that lasted three  
  • centuries, all of it had to be invented. It had to  be manufactured because it was newly created from  
  • the ground up. Now, let's say you're Ptolemy. You've  got this huge army and the resources to keep them  
  • loyal to you, which is a whole different issue.  It's terribly inefficient and not to mention  
  • completely impractical to trot your army out  every time you want someone to do something.  
  • You need a way to manifest that power that doesn't  principally rely on the use of physical force.  
  • A way to fix that power indelibly into the  imagination, both of those you seek to rule and  
  • of your neighbors who want to take away bits of  your kingdom from you. To pull this off, Ptolemy and  
  • later his successors, invested heavily in symbolic  forms of power in order to project authority and  
  • legitimacy at home and abroad. Art, literature,  and knowledge production more generally quickly  
  • became central to their efforts and a massive  research complex known as the library and museum  
  • was created to serve as both a cultural repository  and an international think tank that attracted  
  • superstars in every branch of learning in order  to transform an insignificant peripheral city  
  • into the cultural capital, not just of the  Ptolemaic regime but of the entire Greek world.  
  • No single figure was more important to this  effort than a Greek polymath named Kallimachos, whose  
  • efforts are the central focus of my book. Born  into an elite greek family in Kyrene, a well-known  
  • Greek colony in modern-day Libya, Kallimachos became  an influential power broker in Alexandria, the city  
  • on the Nile Delta that Ptolemy was constructing  as the center of his sprawling kingdom  
  • Over the course of some five decades, Kallimachos  manipulated the levers of power as the first three  
  • Ptolemaic kings set in place the building blocks  of a dynasty that would endure for three centuries. 
  • While his name is unfamiliar to most people  today, well-known Roman authors like Virgil,  
  • Horace, and Ovid considered Kallimachos to be the  most influential Greek literary figure after  
  • Homer. Among other things, Kallimachos was responsible  for organizing the vast and growing collection of  
  • texts that Ptolemy was acquiring for his library,  which aimed to acquire every book ever written.  
  • Kallimachos thus became a gatekeeper for a  vast store of knowledge and cultural memory.  
  • He wrote dozens and dozens of works in both prose  and poetry, establishing himself as the dominant  
  • literary figure of his time. Of that massive output,  only a single one of his books survives today.  
  • Paradoxically, that one book has received rather  little attention from modern scholars, who've been  
  • kept pretty busy trying to piece back together  his other fragmentary works. Though long overlooked,  
  • Kallimachos' surviving book offers us an important  window into the foundations of the Ptolemaic  
  • regime; an anthology of poems written throughout  his career. We call this book, The Hymns, because  
  • it contains six songs of praise celebrating the  major Olympian gods: Zeus, Apollo (who gets two hymns),  
  • Artemis, Athena, and Demeter. Long thought  to be curiosities of a purely religious  
  • or literary character, and of interest only to  a small group of esoteric poetry specialists,  
  • these carefully crafted works must be read in  dialogue with the burgeoning efforts to manifest  
  • political power and authority in the first decades  of the Ptolemaic regime. Kallimachos was neither a  
  • propagandist for the crown, nor a reactionary  critic. And instead he staked out a position  
  • all his own that allowed him to stay close to  power and yet also influence its development.  
  • Working within an authoritarian regime in  which the king's favor could devastate you  
  • just as quickly as it could elevate you,  was tricky business. And so Kallimachos was  
  • forced to become a master of figured speech. When  Kallimachos sang the praises of the all-powerful gods,  
  • he described them as kings and queens, part of a  divine family and a unified political regime. In so  
  • doing, he adapted and amplified elements that were  central to the narratives that the Ptolemies were  
  • advancing about themselves. In this way, Kallimachos  helped merge the Ptolemaic kings and queens  
  • with gods and heroic figures from legend who  already occupied a place in people's imagination.  
  • Thus when Kallimachos sang a song praising Zeus as  the king of the gods he subtly repackaged the god  
  • in a way that gave him a sort of Ptolemaic family  resemblance, thereby co-opting him as a supporter  
  • and legitimizer of the new regime. Of course  when Kallimachos did it, it looked a little nicer.
  • Moreover, Kallimachos sought to redefine  both Zeus and Ptolemy, all but erasing the  
  • space between the two as individuals, presenting  them as virtually synonymous with one another.  
  • This went hand in hand with other efforts  the regime was undertaking to harness the  
  • authority of such larger than life figures.  So we can set Kallimachos' songs side by side  
  • with freshly minted coins, new monumental building  programs, innovations in religious worship, and even  
  • foreign and military policy to gain a more  complete picture of the diverse efforts that  
  • coalesced around institutionalizing  and perpetuating the regime's power.
  • My book is the first attempt to study Kallimachos' hymns in its entirety, analyzing how the six hymns,  
  • both individually and collectively, seek to  reshape political values in order to bolster  
  • the Ptolemaic regime and secure a place for  literature and for Kallimachos at its core.
  • [Music]